One night last week I had a dream.
I dreamed that I was in a crowd of people and they were all moving and acting as if in some kind of trance or robotic state. I remember looking at a few people standing to my right and they all lifted their arms in the air at the same time for no apparent logical reason.
Then I awoke , not remembering the dream in details the way I usually remember dreams. What was strong on me and remained was the intense feeling of what it was like to act according to a controlling power.
I thought the dream a little strange and even though it impacted me, I did not think it was a dream from the Lord.
Then ..
The next night I dreamed the same dream with the same emotion heavy upon me upon waking in the morning.
Having the same dream twice was unusual so I prayed asking the Lord to show me what it meant if there was something I was supposed to learn from the dream.
Then the third night I dreamed the dream again, except this time, in the dream, I asked what the dream meant.
I was given ... "There is no power"
Somewhat puzzled I asked, "Then what is the moral of the dream?"
I was given ... "While there is no power forcing people to do what they do, if they believe there is a power then it is the same as if there was."
***
I will not forget the feeling of that 'power' that permeated my dream. I felt the convincing control it had over people, so convincing that the people did not question it, in fact, seemed unaware of it.
When I awoke from the third dream I understood the meaning of it.
People have forgotten the God-given authority of free will that every man has. That free will trumps any other power that would control us. Yet people so often submit to whatever promises them an easy way out or they give in/give up believing that what is confronting them is too big for them to overcome.
Often, believing there is a 'power' preventing them from attaining what they need or desire leads to despondency or depression. Doesn't God's Word say, "Resist the devil and he will FLEE from you!"? James 4:7
How often do we , even as believers, give in the feeling/belief that we do not have the courage or strength or ability to stand against every lie or deception of the enemy.
Yet Ps. 53:5 says ... "There they were in great fear where no fear was...." Why?? because God had destroyed the enemy but they did not yet believe that the enemy was rendered powerless.
Do we really believe Jesus' words ... "Whom the Son sets free is free indeed !" ? John 8:36
Would Jesus tell us something that isn't true ?
If we really believed that would we even fear being controlled by any other power ?
Freedom! How sweet is the sound of that word, and freedom is what Jesus promised that His children have!
We are free -- free to make the choices we know are the right ones, free to pray and believe God will intervene in the situations/needs we bring before Him, free to think God's thoughts, free to walk in thankfulness , free to make a difference in the world we touch.
The only thing that can defeat us is believing that there is a power preventing us from attaining all that God has promised and desires to bring into our life.
Monday, March 31, 2014
Monday, March 24, 2014
A Forgiveness Bouquet
While I read with a passion, there are some books that leave a deposit in my spirit that lingers and grows and changes me in some way.
I recently read a book by Michael Phillips that touched me deeply.
The story centres on a waif of a child, older than she looked who was 'different' in a way that made the villagers , adult and children alike , ridicule her and torment her with words and even daring to lay physical abuse upon her.
This child learned to be content with her own company and spent the hours of her childhood roaming the hills and fields surrounding her country home. In God's nature, she learned to know the heart of the God she loved and understood in the innocent ways of a child untarnished by worldly influence. She loved the sea, the sky and all of God's creatures.
When someone would hurt her with cruel words or actions, she gave no counter response, not even in word, but would run to her secret favourite places where she would stoop again and again until she had gathered a bouquet of wild flowers. Tying them together with a string she would slip unnoticed back into the village to the cottage where the one lived who had hurt her and would hang this bouquet above the door.
It was her "forgiveness bouquet".
The story threads through her life and the lives of those she touched and the lives of those whose character was changed because of her gentle, quiet wisdom and heart of forgiveness that could not be argued against.
If we all practised 'forgiveness bouquets' instead of retaliation, instead of carrying grudges or allowing our hearts to be filled with resentment and desire for retribution, would our world not be a radically different place ? The change beginning with our own hearts, our own homes, our own neighbourhoods , reaching out into our world.
Is that not the kind of hearts Jesus seeks ?
Our God IS a God who forgives .. over and over again ... and who among us does not need or desire His forgiveness? And yet we sometimes forget how important forgiveness is to God. He watches to see how easily and quickly we forgive those who hurt us.
Mar 11:25,26 "And whenever you stand praying, if you have anything against anyone, forgive him, that your Father in heaven may also forgive you your trespasses. But if you do not forgive, neither will your Father in heaven forgive your trespasses."
Mat 6:14 "For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you."
Luk 17:4 And if he sins against you seven times in a day, and seven times in a day returns to you, saying, 'I repent,' you shall forgive him."
Does God not care if we are hurt ? Ohh.. yes.. but He does not want US to have to carry the burden of unforgiveness which is like a cancer that eats at us from the inside out and robs us of the joy and blessings that God desires to pour out upon us. And unforgiveness cannot remain hidden, it will also hurt those we live with and love.
God wants us to trust Him to make all rights right, not only in our own life and heart but also in the hearts and lives of those who are not yet His. How often undeserved/unexpected forgiveness is the key to a locked relational door.
We are approaching the Passover/Easter season. It is a time to reflect and think about what God did for us in sending Jesus to provide for us the ultimate forgiveness we could not obtain at any lesser price than what He paid for it - His life.
The forgiveness of God unlocked the door, tore the veil, that stood between us and intimacy in relationship with Him ! How precious, how powerful indeed is forgiveness !
*****
The name of the book I read, and highly recommend, is From Across the Ancient Waters and the sequel The Treasure of the Celtic Triangle. by Michael Phillips
Saturday, March 22, 2014
The Mysterious Melchizedec
I wish I had a quarter for every time someone wondered who Melchizedec was, the man who met Abraham after his successful rescue of his captured nephew.
There is more to understand about Melchizedec than what is commonly taught in Christian circles.
First, Melchizedec is not a name, it is a title.
This man, who met Abraham, uniquely had two roles, he was "Priest of the God Most High" (Gen.14:18) and he was also the King of Salem (meaning 'peace') . Therefore, being both King and Priest - the combined titles make up the word we have mistakenly taken to be a given name, Melchizedec. Melchi is Hebrew for King, and Zedec or Zadok is Hebrew for Righteousness.
His Hebrew 'name' Melchizedec translated into English would simply be KingRighteousness.
(Therefore as a Priest of God, when he met Abraham, he came to bless him with the words of God given to him to deliver.)
What I want to do here is explain the connection between Melchizedec and Jesus, since the link between the two is stated in Heb 5:10 , "called by God as High Priest "ACCORDING TO THE ORDER OF MELCHIZEDEK,"
Let's look at the pieces one by one.
What is meant by 'order' ?
Order is defined in the dictionary as the arrangement or disposition of people or things in relation to each other according to a particular sequence, pattern, or method.
The 'order' we are examining is a called out succession of men, 'put in a row', meeting the requirements God Himself put forth.
What we readily understand is that under the leadership of Moses, we have God calling out one tribe of Israel -- the Levites, who would be in charge of the things concerning the worship and sacrifices and rituals of temple service.
From that tribe of Levites, God called out Aaron and his line of descendants to be the High Priests - standing in a place of service before God that only the High Priest could fill.
But what we miss is there is another line of priests that precedes the Mosaic 'law', a line of Zadok priests whose righteousness qualified them to serve as the High Priest of God.
The very first Zadok, (we are not told specifically) but we do have a hint, that Seth was 'an appointed seed'. (Gen. 4:25) and in his time people began to call on the name of the Lord.
What we are told is that Melchizedec was without question a Priest called of God in the line of Zadok or Righteous priests.
This line, including Melchizedec and traced through his 'seed', follows down into the tribe of Levites, and into the line of Aaron. Those in this line of Zadok priests were set apart from that of the other High Priests who needed themselves to be cleansed of their sin before entering the Holy of Holies to intercede for the sins of the people. (this is important as I will show)
It is important to note that the 'order' of the Zadok priests preceeds the law, because the final Zadok High Priest (Jesus) was not a High Priest under the law. Just as Melchizedec came to the father (Abraham) of those who walk by faith, (Rom. 4:16) so Jesus comes to the children of Abraham or those who, like him, walk by faith in Jesus, both Jew and Gentile.
The Zakok Priests stayed faithful in their 'righteousness' before God, even when everyone around them was unfaithful. There was an unbroken line of Zadok priests ... ending with Jesus.
I showed in my last post how we know that Zacharias was the ligitamate High Priest rather than the impostor Caiaphas, but Zacharias was also a Zadok priest. How do we know ?
His righteousness is specifically noted, and also the righteousness of his wife Elizabeth, also an important detail. Why?
In II Chron. 27:1 we have a reference to the mother of a righteous king. It is noted that she was the daughter of Zadok . If the Hebrew word was used in our NT account, we would have it noted that Elizabeth was the daughter of the sons of Zadok. It is important that we have that fact. Mary, the mother of Jesus was related to Elizabeth, rather than John, so the 'seed of Zadok' (Ez. 46:19) was also passed to Mary, otherwise Jesus would not be in the seed line , or descendants of Zadok and He could not be linked to Melchizedec.
No priest could be annointed for service before the age of thirty. We read in Luke 3:23 at the time of his baptism by John, that Jesus begain His ministry at about thirty years of age.
Even at the age of twelve, Jesus was already astounding the leaders with His teaching in the temple - so His being a teacher had nothing to do with His age. It was important to note His age at His baptism because He was being anointed as the last and final Zakok High Priest.
It is also important that Jesus was of the seed of the Zadok High Priests, rather than just descended from Aaron because He did not have to be cleansed of His own sin before entering the Holy of Holies to make intercession for the sins of those He died for.
He was of the order of Melchizedec because He also holds a dual title, being not only a Righteous High Priest but also, like Melchizedec, a King of Peace, being of the tribe of Judah and a descendent of King David.
There is more to understand about Melchizedec than what is commonly taught in Christian circles.
First, Melchizedec is not a name, it is a title.
This man, who met Abraham, uniquely had two roles, he was "Priest of the God Most High" (Gen.14:18) and he was also the King of Salem (meaning 'peace') . Therefore, being both King and Priest - the combined titles make up the word we have mistakenly taken to be a given name, Melchizedec. Melchi is Hebrew for King, and Zedec or Zadok is Hebrew for Righteousness.
His Hebrew 'name' Melchizedec translated into English would simply be KingRighteousness.
(Therefore as a Priest of God, when he met Abraham, he came to bless him with the words of God given to him to deliver.)
What I want to do here is explain the connection between Melchizedec and Jesus, since the link between the two is stated in Heb 5:10 , "called by God as High Priest "ACCORDING TO THE ORDER OF MELCHIZEDEK,"
What is meant by 'order' ?
Order is defined in the dictionary as the arrangement or disposition of people or things in relation to each other according to a particular sequence, pattern, or method.
The 'order' we are examining is a called out succession of men, 'put in a row', meeting the requirements God Himself put forth.
What we readily understand is that under the leadership of Moses, we have God calling out one tribe of Israel -- the Levites, who would be in charge of the things concerning the worship and sacrifices and rituals of temple service.
From that tribe of Levites, God called out Aaron and his line of descendants to be the High Priests - standing in a place of service before God that only the High Priest could fill.
But what we miss is there is another line of priests that precedes the Mosaic 'law', a line of Zadok priests whose righteousness qualified them to serve as the High Priest of God.
The very first Zadok, (we are not told specifically) but we do have a hint, that Seth was 'an appointed seed'. (Gen. 4:25) and in his time people began to call on the name of the Lord.
What we are told is that Melchizedec was without question a Priest called of God in the line of Zadok or Righteous priests.
This line, including Melchizedec and traced through his 'seed', follows down into the tribe of Levites, and into the line of Aaron. Those in this line of Zadok priests were set apart from that of the other High Priests who needed themselves to be cleansed of their sin before entering the Holy of Holies to intercede for the sins of the people. (this is important as I will show)
It is important to note that the 'order' of the Zadok priests preceeds the law, because the final Zadok High Priest (Jesus) was not a High Priest under the law. Just as Melchizedec came to the father (Abraham) of those who walk by faith, (Rom. 4:16) so Jesus comes to the children of Abraham or those who, like him, walk by faith in Jesus, both Jew and Gentile.
While we could look at a thread of Zadoks traced through the Old Testament , I want to point out a verse in Ez. 48:11 that speaks clearly of the distinction of the Zadoks .. Verse 10 and 12 speak of the sanctuary of the Lord being placed in the middle of the 'most holy' district given to the descendants/sons of Zadok. Then verse 11 gives the reason why, "It shall be for the priests of the sons of Zadok, who are sanctified, who have kept My charge, who did not go astray when the children of Israel went astray , as the Levites went astray."
The Zakok Priests stayed faithful in their 'righteousness' before God, even when everyone around them was unfaithful. There was an unbroken line of Zadok priests ... ending with Jesus.
I showed in my last post how we know that Zacharias was the ligitamate High Priest rather than the impostor Caiaphas, but Zacharias was also a Zadok priest. How do we know ?
His righteousness is specifically noted, and also the righteousness of his wife Elizabeth, also an important detail. Why?
In II Chron. 27:1 we have a reference to the mother of a righteous king. It is noted that she was the daughter of Zadok . If the Hebrew word was used in our NT account, we would have it noted that Elizabeth was the daughter of the sons of Zadok. It is important that we have that fact. Mary, the mother of Jesus was related to Elizabeth, rather than John, so the 'seed of Zadok' (Ez. 46:19) was also passed to Mary, otherwise Jesus would not be in the seed line , or descendants of Zadok and He could not be linked to Melchizedec.
No priest could be annointed for service before the age of thirty. We read in Luke 3:23 at the time of his baptism by John, that Jesus begain His ministry at about thirty years of age.
Even at the age of twelve, Jesus was already astounding the leaders with His teaching in the temple - so His being a teacher had nothing to do with His age. It was important to note His age at His baptism because He was being anointed as the last and final Zakok High Priest.
It is also important that Jesus was of the seed of the Zadok High Priests, rather than just descended from Aaron because He did not have to be cleansed of His own sin before entering the Holy of Holies to make intercession for the sins of those He died for.
He was of the order of Melchizedec because He also holds a dual title, being not only a Righteous High Priest but also, like Melchizedec, a King of Peace, being of the tribe of Judah and a descendent of King David.
Wednesday, March 12, 2014
Imposter by Design
The year was about 5 BC.
The day, the most Holy Day on Israel's yearly calendar. Yom Kippur or Feast of Atonement.
The question on everyone's mind that morning was -- Would their sin be covered for another year? Or instead of God's mercy, would His wrath fall upon them in judgement.
As was the custom, the people - pressing together-, gathered at the temple. They stood, watching, waiting with bated breath as the High Priest took the incense censor into the Holy of Holies to intercede for and receive forgiveness from God to cover the nation's year's-worth accumulation of sin.
The day, the most Holy Day on Israel's yearly calendar. Yom Kippur or Feast of Atonement.
The question on everyone's mind that morning was -- Would their sin be covered for another year? Or instead of God's mercy, would His wrath fall upon them in judgement.
As was the custom, the people - pressing together-, gathered at the temple. They stood, watching, waiting with bated breath as the High Priest took the incense censor into the Holy of Holies to intercede for and receive forgiveness from God to cover the nation's year's-worth accumulation of sin.
But wait ... who was the High Priest at that time? Does our scripture, in Matt. 26:3 not record it as being Caiaphas?
But it is not Caiaphas we see preparing to enter the Holy of Holies, it is Zacharias! What is going on ?
But it is not Caiaphas we see preparing to enter the Holy of Holies, it is Zacharias! What is going on ?
Only the High Priest was allowed to enter the Holy of Holies, and that only on this one Holy Day of the year.
So why was Caiaphas not fulfilling the High Priest's God-given duty on this most holy day ?
One reason .. and one reason only - it was a matter of life and death!
The High Priest had to be a direct descendent of Aaron and to enter the Holy of Holies the High Priest himself had to be righteous before he could intercede for the people.
Oops ! Caiphas has two strikes against him !
One- he was an imposter High Priest, put in place by Herod who , in naming Caiaphas as the High Priest ignored the fact that he was not descended from Aaron.
Two - he was hardly righteous!
But if it did not trouble him that he could not claim Aaron in his ancestral tree, why would he allow someone else to usurp his honoured place of service in the Holy of Holies ?
Ahhhhh .. it seems he still had the fear of God in him somewhere. If a High Priest was not righteous, was not clean before God, and he entered the Holy of Holies, he would never come out ! God would strike him dead the second he stepped behind the veil !
That was a deterrent strong enough to cause Caiaphas to quite willingly allow another to take his place.
Someone who rightfully filled the role of High Priest at that time.
And who fit the requirements? None other than Zacharias !
How do we know that Zacharias was the 'legitimate' High Priest at that time ?
Three reasons .
1. Zacharias was of the lineage of Aaron -- We are told in Luke 1:5, that he was of the order of Abijah - that order is named in I Chron. 24:10 under the lineage of Aaron.
2. Zacharias was righteous . Luke 1:5 is careful to make note of this.
3. Zacharias was not struck dead in the Holy of Holies. If he had not been the true High Priest at that time offering the incense in the Holy of Holies, he would never have left the Holy of Holies alive.
But .... while Caiaphas was an imposter High Priest -- God 'designed' His plan in such a way that it looks like Caiaphas was exactly where he needed to be for God's plan to unfold in perfect symmetry.
(to come in future post -- How did Jesus become our High Priest? and what does Melchezidec have to do with it ?)
And who fit the requirements? None other than Zacharias !
How do we know that Zacharias was the 'legitimate' High Priest at that time ?
Three reasons .
1. Zacharias was of the lineage of Aaron -- We are told in Luke 1:5, that he was of the order of Abijah - that order is named in I Chron. 24:10 under the lineage of Aaron.
2. Zacharias was righteous . Luke 1:5 is careful to make note of this.
3. Zacharias was not struck dead in the Holy of Holies. If he had not been the true High Priest at that time offering the incense in the Holy of Holies, he would never have left the Holy of Holies alive.
But .... while Caiaphas was an imposter High Priest -- God 'designed' His plan in such a way that it looks like Caiaphas was exactly where he needed to be for God's plan to unfold in perfect symmetry.
(to come in future post -- How did Jesus become our High Priest? and what does Melchezidec have to do with it ?)
Sunday, March 2, 2014
Smarter than The Average Crow
I found the above video online this morning and wanted to share it with you !
God's creation never fails to astound and delight me ! The above example falls into my delight 'box'.
When I went to school I was taught that science had proved the difference between man and animal was that animals could not use tools and occupied their lives with the things they instinctively knew were necessary for survival.
But now we know, not only can animals use tools, but as the above video shows, they can also figure out how to 'create' toys!
Who could have guessed that a crow could conceive of the idea that if he used a plastic lid as a sled, found a snow covered roof and then starting at the top, standing on the lid could actually have fun sliding down the roof !
What I can't figure out is .... if I could fly would I think sledding was fun ? Maybe its just in doing something 'different' that we find our fun, especially if we are a crow !
There is a verse in Job where the Lord speaks and says ...
"Who has put wisdom in the mind? or who has given understanding to the heart?"
Job 38:36
Yet, how often do we hold back from putting our trust in the One who is the source of ALL wisdom. The one who created the crow and whispered the idea of sledding into his mind. If we can be impressed with the wisdom and ability of a crow who is a mere detail in God's creation , how much more should we be continually - without doubting - be impressed with the wisdom of our God ?
To be impressed by the crow and yet doubt God, is that not the same as admiring an artist's paintings and yet doubt the artistic ability or gifting of the artist himself?
I have heard several times this last week people express their questions about why God did this or why He allowed that or why He didn't stop this.
Next time we are tempted to question or doubt God's wisdom in His actions, let us remember this little crow and how his 'wisdom' impressed us and then remind ourselves of how much more we should believe in the Infinite wisdom of God, in all situations, every day !
If He cares to delight a crow in play, will He not surely exercise His wisdom ,unfailingly,on our behalf, whom He calls His children ?
Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, to God who alone is wise, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen.
1Ti 1:17
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)